Canada’s Debate

"Your confusing thesis has captured my attention; tell me more."

June 24, 2007

In Defense of Backwardness

PhilosophyFiled under: Philosophy
By: Joseph @ 4:12 pm

Reading this post got me thinking about my sister. Now, my sister is neither Anglican or gay (and hopefully she is not reading this.) However, she is a feminist… a trait for which I admire her. Every year during passover she places an orange on the seder plate. While the story she uses is apocryphal, I get her point. I just don’t agree with it; not because I think Judaism should exclude women, gays, transexuals, etc., but because changing Judaism in order to include yourself means you’re not actually being a Jew.

I will explain, in the context of this same-sex marriage story. Regardless of whether or not the Anglican church decides to bless gay marriages, the idea of “pressuring” the church kind of irks me. Naturally religions change, so if they choose to change then there is no problem. However, religions are not public institutions (or, rather they shouldn’t be) and as long as they break no laws the state or civil society has no right to intervene. That’s fairly basic libertarianism right there… no surprises so far.

What does bug me is this idea that religion needs to change to suit the demands or desires of those who are otherwise excluded by said religion. I find it the height of hypocrisy for someone to actively pressure a religious group to change so that person can seek inclusion. If you find a religion that you identify with distasteful then you are confused about your own spirituality and beliefs; it is not the responsibility of the religion to change, it is the obligation of you to reconcile your personal and spiritual beliefs. Lets illustrate…

The Torah is the essence of Judaism. The Torah says “eating Pork is forbidden” and I eat pork. Lets say that one day I have a religious awakening and want to rediscover my jewish-ness (fat chance) but I still love eating the bacon… If I expect Judaism to change to accommodate my beliefs then I am moving it away from the Torah. What then am I believing in? I’m pursuing this idea of religion and inclusion, instead of making the hard choices that real faith demands.

Now, some may scoff at my talking about faith. I will say this once and once only: I have tremendous faith… in the natural world and the rational, ordered laws which govern it; and yes, this faith has required me to make choices.

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


 

Liberalism is...

The primacy of individual human agency, as secured by the enshrinement individual or collective rights.

- Joseph Krengel

Recent Comments:

In Harper sucks
Darren T.: Stephen Harper is like George Bush. George W. Bush laid war on Iraq, which is not so great. I would not be suprised if Stephen Harper turned out to...

In Harper sucks
Darren T.: Hmm, I can clearly see that all of you people hate Stephen Harper. I can also see some of you have bad grammer. I have nothing against Harper. I just...

In Harper sucks
Bill Baskett: i have nothing intelligent to say. i'm not a politician. assholes cover that game. i spark thought.

In Harper sucks
Corey boileau: i now hes gay lol!!!!!!!!!!!!11

In Harper sucks
Dylan villeneuve: lol harper sucks dick y did u tools vote 4 him im fuck

June 2007
S M T W T F S
« May   Jul »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930


Themes: