<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.6" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Victims, not experts</title>
	<link>http://www.canadasdebate.com/2007/02/28/victims-not-experts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.6</generator>

	<item>
		<title>&#187; Anti-Terror Clauses Ride Off Into Sunset - Out of the Shadows on Victims, not expertsby: </title>
		<link>http://www.canadasdebate.com/2007/02/28/victims-not-experts/#comment-1297</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 10:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.canadasdebate.com/2007/02/28/victims-not-experts/#comment-1297</guid>
					<description>[...] Joseph over at Canada&#8217;s Debate puts the family&#8217;s involvement into perspective: A victim should have a voice when discussing justice, and when applicable restitution. But in my experience personal tragedy by itself imparts no particular knowledge or expertise. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Joseph over at Canada&#8217;s Debate puts the family&#8217;s involvement into perspective: A victim should have a voice when discussing justice, and when applicable restitution. But in my experience personal tragedy by itself imparts no particular knowledge or expertise. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Joseph on Victims, not expertsby: </title>
		<link>http://www.canadasdebate.com/2007/02/28/victims-not-experts/#comment-1293</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.canadasdebate.com/2007/02/28/victims-not-experts/#comment-1293</guid>
					<description>Which words exactly are biting me? Coulter said that the women in question enjoyed their husbands' deaths, which is absurd and offensive, and in no way contradicted by what I have said.

I felt the same way about those women being put on display by the Democrats as I do with the Conservatives' latest PR stunt.

So perhaps you should stow in the indignation and save it for an occasion when you're actually correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which words exactly are biting me? Coulter said that the women in question enjoyed their husbands&#8217; deaths, which is absurd and offensive, and in no way contradicted by what I have said.</p>
<p>I felt the same way about those women being put on display by the Democrats as I do with the Conservatives&#8217; latest PR stunt.</p>
<p>So perhaps you should stow in the indignation and save it for an occasion when you&#8217;re actually correct?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>chris from winnipeg on Victims, not expertsby: </title>
		<link>http://www.canadasdebate.com/2007/02/28/victims-not-experts/#comment-1292</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.canadasdebate.com/2007/02/28/victims-not-experts/#comment-1292</guid>
					<description>So I guess by your comments about Maureen Basnicki, you had no problem with Ann Coulter's comments about the 9-1-1 widows.(who BTW, were being trotted out by Democrats, not Republicans.) 

Don't you just hate it when your own words come back to bite you in the a$$?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I guess by your comments about Maureen Basnicki, you had no problem with Ann Coulter&#8217;s comments about the 9-1-1 widows.(who BTW, were being trotted out by Democrats, not Republicans.) </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you just hate it when your own words come back to bite you in the a$$?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>wilson61 on Victims, not expertsby: </title>
		<link>http://www.canadasdebate.com/2007/02/28/victims-not-experts/#comment-1285</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.canadasdebate.com/2007/02/28/victims-not-experts/#comment-1285</guid>
					<description>Iggy called it 'a side show',  guess he won't be losing any sleep over Canadian victims of terrorism.  
Those mean spirited Liberals!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iggy called it &#8216;a side show&#8217;,  guess he won&#8217;t be losing any sleep over Canadian victims of terrorism.<br />
Those mean spirited Liberals!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Halden on Victims, not expertsby: </title>
		<link>http://www.canadasdebate.com/2007/02/28/victims-not-experts/#comment-1284</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.canadasdebate.com/2007/02/28/victims-not-experts/#comment-1284</guid>
					<description>Indeed, but you must admit that the GOP has perfected it as of late, take the "snowflake" kids in the stem cell debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, but you must admit that the GOP has perfected it as of late, take the &#8220;snowflake&#8221; kids in the stem cell debate.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Joseph on Victims, not expertsby: </title>
		<link>http://www.canadasdebate.com/2007/02/28/victims-not-experts/#comment-1283</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.canadasdebate.com/2007/02/28/victims-not-experts/#comment-1283</guid>
					<description>This is not a "republican" or "conservative" strategy. Politicians of all stripes have been doing this for decades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a &#8220;republican&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; strategy. Politicians of all stripes have been doing this for decades.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Halden on Victims, not expertsby: </title>
		<link>http://www.canadasdebate.com/2007/02/28/victims-not-experts/#comment-1282</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.canadasdebate.com/2007/02/28/victims-not-experts/#comment-1282</guid>
					<description>This was an appalling attempt to use an emotional reaction to elicit a vote favourable to keeping a freedom restricting legislation. Another bonehead move by Steve that appears to borrowed from the Republican playbook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was an appalling attempt to use an emotional reaction to elicit a vote favourable to keeping a freedom restricting legislation. Another bonehead move by Steve that appears to borrowed from the Republican playbook.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
